Saturday, March 26, 2011

Anna Nicole (TV)

Anna Nicole is a new opera, created by Mark Anthony-Turnage and Richard Thomas, which premiered at the Royal Opera House in February this year, and was broadcast on BBC4 the a couple of evenings ago [I caught it on iPlayer]. It follows the life of the former Playboy model Anna Nicole Smith, famous for marrying an 89 year old man and dying of a drugs overdose at the age of 39.

This production follows Anna Nicole (Eva-Maria Westbroek) as she goes from young wife & mother in Mexica, to single mum & pole dancer in Houston, to wife of elderly oil magnate J Howard Marshall II (Alan Oke) and finally to a falling apart addict, reliant on the support of lawyer Howard Stern (Gerald Finley).

As a disclaimer, I know very little, close to nothing about opera really. To me, however,
Anna Nicole was reminiscent of a mix of operetta and musical, so it was not alienating. Although this could perhaps be down to the fact that the opera is entirely in English...with English subtitles, which were occasionally useful when the accents of the leads (notably Westbroek) could make the words unclear.

I actually quite liked
Anna Nicole. The use of the omniscient chorus of the press was a clever (who disappear at the beginning of Act 2, then turn up again at the end of it) idea of showing the constant media attention on Smith. Although I will admit to feeling sorry for the dancers who had to spend the entire show with cameras on their heads. The opera doesn't go really deeply into any of the events, which could cause problems if you wish to know more about Smith's life, as opposed to just being a general comment on celebrity. However, there are some really clever moments, such as the 'Gentleman's Club' scene, the fit over Marshall's inheritance and the rather dark scene depicting Stern's managing of Anna Nicole's life in order to gain her more publicity. In addition to not knowing much about opera, I also don't know very much about Anna Nicole Smith, apart from the very end bit of her life; so I can't really comment on how well the piece explored it. What was quite interesting was the fact that they didn't offer one definitive way that things happened; they'd present Stern or Anna's version of events and counteract it with Marshall's family's views or Anna's mother, Virgie's (Susan Bickley) beliefs.

The performances were all good. As the title role, Eva-Marie Westbroek was very good, bringing an edge of innocence and desparation to the role, even if occasionally her accent diverged from the Southern voice, that is actually made much of as part of the text. As ring-master Stern, Gerald Finley was very good, being both charming and slightly scary (the real-life Stern is apparently very unhappy with this portrayal). To be honest, my next favourite performance came from the entire Opera House Chorus; who brought real life to all the ensemble characters. But, from the named players, Bickley brought a sense of pain to Virgie, Nicole Smith's much maligned wife and Alan Oke was fine as the elderly man totally in love with Smith.

Whilst occassionally some of the jokes in the piece were rammed home through far too much reptetition, and some of the language seemed crude just for the hell of it;
Anna Nicole was a perfectly fine piece of theatre (again, I don't feel happy commenting on it in the opera cannon as I know so little about it) with good stage craft and performances; although it didn't quite live up to its hype.

LOGOS: Baby It's You!

Previews begin today for Broadway's latest rock'n'roll bio-musical, Baby It's You!  What potentially sets this one apart from say, Jersey Boys or Million Dollar Quartet are two things: it's about a girl group, not a boy band or male rock stars, and it's really as much about the woman behind the scenes as the girls behind the microphone.

Baby It's You! tells the story of Florence Greenberg (Beth Leavel), a New Jersey housewife who propels the Shirelles and other groups to super stardom by ignoring the male dominated recording establishment and striking out on her own.


The show takes place in the early 1960's, and pretty much everything about this logo/advertising has that vintage feel about it.  Except for perhaps a tad too clean a computerized line, the title block takes you right back to the era of doo-wop and fun fun fun.  The bright, pastel-ish colors that clash and go together at the same time - a turquoise-blue and purple - in a faux cursive that is double printed with white and the word "it's" in a decorative circle, combine to take us back to that familiar, homey feeling of late 50's early 60's advertising.

Then there is the double photo of the logo - a girl group in fashionable and tasteful sparkly cocktail dresses surround a single microphone in synchronized knee-bend faces away from us and toward the footlights; and an ultra-fashionable white woman dominates the photo and the logo both by placement and sheer size.  Her lips perfectly lipsticked, her cats eyes glasses, in a matching color, of course, are held off her nose to reveal piercing eyes that sparkle with a confidence and power.


Those photos at a glance tell us the story - Florence is in charge, a muse to the Shirelles.  And the tag line fills in any possible blanks in getting the simple point across: "The Shirelles made the headlines... She made the Shirelles."

With the gals posed away from us, a border of footlights shining in our eyes, we are also told that this show will be in the mold of Jersey Boys, only this time it will be the rise and fall of a girl group.  A coincidence of similarity?  I really doubt it.


But it is colorful, simple to tell what it is all about.  And if that era's music appeals to you, then the show, and its logo really work.

Grade: A

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.207

Twenty Twelve

I've finally caught up with the first episode of Twenty Twelve, the BBC4 comedy about the people who attempt to make the Olympic Games run smoothly. This first episode begins with the approach '1000 Days' Day; marking a thousand days until the games start. Head of Brand Siobhan Sharpe (Jessica Hynes) has commissioned an artist Anthony (Nicholas Greaves) to create a clock to count down until the opening ceremony. There is also the additional problem of Graham Hitchens (Karl Theobold), Head of Infrastructure, who decides to use the day to test his new traffic light phasing system, thus making all of North and North-East London impassable.

Twenty Twelve is filmed in a mockumentary style, complete with a voice-over commenting on the action and a journalist questioning the key members of the team. Perhaps the most worrying aspect of the show is the fact that you could actually imagine that there are people who actually act like the characters in the show; the over technical language and totally ineffective office workers seem rather realistic. There's a rather unsettling conversation about who should be the torch bearers for the Olympic Games; where names like Prince William, Trinny, Susannah and Gok Wan are banded about by Siobhan; who dismisses J.K. Rowling, as they've 'already got Joanna Lumley, which sort of covers that'.

In addition to the clever language used the show benefits from, firstly, incredible timing. Although it was obviously filmed earlier in the year, this episode was released a few days before the real countdown clock was unveiled, and then stopped working. In Twenty Twelve, the main problem is that the clock counts backwards, from the opening ceremony in July 2012 to the '1000 Day' Day, which is obviously a bit of a problem!

The show also benefits from great performances. As Head of Deliverance Ian Fletcher, Hugh Bonneville is great as a man attempting to bring some kind of order to the assortment of characters in his office, as well as sorting out the '1000 Day' Day, dealing with a sidelined Boris Johnson and organising a get-away with his wife to Barcelona. Perhaps the best performer is Jessica Hynes as the PR woman Siobhan, who seems to communicate in a series of 'okays' and also doesn't appear to be the smartest person in the room. There is also good support from Vincent Franklin as Yorkshireman Head of Operations Nick Jowett and Olivia Coleman as Ian's devoted secretary, Sally, who seems to be constantly plying him with food.

I'm really glad that I've caught up with this, having just caught the second episode as well, and it seems like it'll just get better.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Fill in the Blank Friday


(Thanks to Lauren)
1. My most prized possession is...Either my iPod, without which I feel a little lost...more so than without my laptop; or perhaps the scary amount of Tiffany's I recieved for my birthday. All of which I'm terrified to take off in case they mysteriously get lost between my wrist and the dressing table.

2. If I could be one age for the rest of my life, I would want to be...ha, I don't really think I've had enough of my life to be able to choose! Being 13-14 was perhaps my favourite age, where I was surronded by lovely friends. I quite like being the age I am now, with more independence arriving at last. However, I think being in my late teens/20s will be better. Hopefully.

3. The best way to spend a weekend is...With friends, I really really miss weekends which were that. Two days of just relaxing, occassionally going shopping, or going to the cinema.

4. My outlook on life is...Gosh. I guess I'd describe myself as realistic..others would probably say pessimistic. Although, at the minute, I'm incredibly optimistic about the future, going to university and potential post-uni things are really motivating me right now.

5. If you want to annoy me, just ...be really, really loud and attention-seeking; nothing makes me more angry! Apart from maybe people cracking their knuckles *shudder*

6. I am completely defenseless when it comes to...books that are on offer/low price (I've just found a site where you can the complete works of Gabriel Garcia Marquez for TEN POUNDS [$16?])

7. When dressing for the day one should...wear whatever you feel comfortable in :)

The Last Letter from Your Lover

I first heard of the novel via the Twitter feed of journalist/novelist India Knight, who recommended it; and is even quoted on the book as saying 'I read it in one giant greedy gulp. Jojo Moyes is a brilliant author'. That, and the gorgeous cover (I know you shouldn't judge, but...) made me really interested to read it; plus, I love books that involve letters.

The novel properly begins when journalist Ellie Haworth discovers a love letter from a mysterious 'B' when she is going through the newspaper archives, in which he asks for a woman to leave her husband. In finding this letter, Ellie opens the doors to a forty-year-old love affair involving Jennifer Stirling, the wife of a mining magnate and 'Boot', a journalist.

I adored Moyes' telling of the Jennifer sections of the book, when I read the Prologue, in modern England where Ellie is worrying about her own married lover John, I began to worry that I wouldn't enjoy it. However, I was quite wrong. Moyes opens Jennifer's section after an car accident which has left her unable to remember anything about herself and the reader discovers her past, almost alongside her and then without her as we are transported four years earlier to the first meeting between her and the man that would become her lover. 1960s London is wonderfully brought to life, especially as the changes of technology, fashion and female empowerment come through, although Moyes doesn't shirk from the problems that women still faced (such as through gaining a divorce). Moyes was successful in managing to build up enough sympathy for Jennifer that you could root for her to leave her husband and begin a new life, something that can be quite difficult to do; plus, she makes Laurence (the husband) a 3D character, as opposed to making him just A Bad Man Who Doesn't Understand.

My enjoyment of this part of the novel managed to override my lack of interest in Ellie's problems. To be honest, whilst Moyes made me sympathesie with Jennifer, I struggled with Ellie. To me, she seemed like a perfectly nice character who didn't really need to be with the married John; she seemed like she could quite easily find a nicer man. Plus, I found the ending a little bit too sentimental and cheesy, although I was moved by the events, it felt a little bit too mushy for me.

However, all things considered, I really did enjoy this book. It's a lovely romance, which doesn't have a typical ending. Plus, I loved the letters, as with Possession there seems to be something inherently more romantic in letter writing than in texts (as seen in Moyes using texts between Ellie and John); and I learnt more about the troubles in 1960s Congo than I expected to. I'd definitely say to pick this book up if you'd like a lovely, fun read, especially now that the weather seems to be brightening up.

One of the great things about Moyes' novel is her use of real 'last letters'. My personal favourite (?):
Happy Birthday! Enclosed is your birthday present which I hope you like...I am thinking of you especially today...because I have decided that although I love you, I am not in love with you. I don't feel that you are God's One for me. Anyway, I really hope that you like your present and that you have a fantastic birthday. (Female to Male, email) I hope he found someone else!

DVD REVIEW: Passing Strange

My friend Mike and I usually disagree on small things or a specific performance when we see a show.  It is rare at we completely agree.  And every once in awhile, we completely disagree.  Passing Strange is one of those instances.  I saw the show on Broadway, and found it to be self-important, smug, ego-driven, and most of all dull.  Oh, and as pretentious as referring to yourself in the third person or by name as Stew does, or referring to your movie as a "Joint" like Spike Lee does.

Mike and I did not see this show together, and so it seemed completely out of the blue when he emailed to say he watched the movie version and was quite fond of it.  And so I asked him to write a review of the show/DVD, knowing that I would not be wasting another 135 minutes of my life on Stew and his crew, but realizing maybe some of you might be interested.  And so, here is my best buddy's guest blog.  Enjoy!

DVD: Passing Strange.  An IFC Film.  A Spike Lee Joint.  Filmed live at the Belasco Theatre in New York City in 2008.  Book, music and lyrics by Stew.  Starring Stew, Daniel Breaker, Rebecca Naomi Jones, De'Adre Aziza, Colman Domingo, Eisa Davis and Chad Goodrich. Directed by Spike Lee.  2009.  135 minutes.  Not rated.

Grade: B+

Have you ever seen a show and thought, "wow, that was a clever concept! I wonder how they managed to screw it up?" I sure have. Well, Passing Strange is just the opposite: the story is pretty lackluster, but the execution is so sincere and compelling that I found this video version of the 2008 Stew musical to be quite satisfying.

About that story... let's just say that it traces the artistic (or maybe pseudo-artistic) journey of the kind of self-absorbed young man that, well, only a mother could love. In pursuit of musical inspiration, a callow Youth (Daniel Breaker as a younger version of Stew himself) travels from Los Angeles to Amsterdam to Berlin, alienating everyone who cares about him along the way, without ever really discovering what it means to be a real artist, or indeed what it means to be real at all. I can't blame audience members who wondered "what's the point?" and maybe even "who the hell is this Stew guy to think that he deserves to be telling this story on Broadway?"

The show is basically a satire, but the targets of the satire - the foibles of a middle-class African American upbringing in 1970s Los Angeles, the casual sex and innocent debauchery of Amsterdam, the post-modern anger and emptiness of Berlin - don't have much resonance, unless you've led a life pretty much like Stew's. Only towards the end of the show do things converge in the direction of a more universal theme, but even then, the lessons are not terribly original (if you've seen Home Alone, then you've already learned them).

What, then, is the appeal of this show and this video? Well, if you're traveling with the right people, a road trip can be fun even if the scenery is blah and the destination is meh; in much the same way, the people who tell this story and the music that is used to tell it make Passing Strange worth the time. The cast is superb: Breaker as our (anti?) hero; Eisa Davis as his very sympathetic and long-suffering mother; and a quartet of young actors who play the Youth's friends and compatriots at various stages of his journey: Rebecca Naomi Jones (terrific also in American Idiot), Colman Domingo (even more terrific in The Scottsboro Boys), De'Adre Aziza (Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown), and Chad Goodridge. All give fascinating performances, and all work very hard (most of them end up soaked in sweat by the time the show is over).

And then there's Stew, who is the creator of the show, its central performer, and its soul. I found him very likable and enjoyed his casual sense of humor, and I very much enjoy his singing voice, which can be both strident and soothing. Even though the Tony he won was (inexplicably) for Best Book, it's really the score that makes this show work. There are some beautiful, heart-tugging ballads ("Keys," "Come Down Now") and some energetic rock songs ("We Might Play All Night," "Passing Phase"). There's also some trippy chromaticism to accompany various drug binges and some vivid passages that do a much better job than the dialogue in establishing the atmosphere of cities like Amsterdam and Berlin.

Even though the story of Passing Strange leaves a lot to be desired, the script does have a few high points. There's lots of humor, much of it quite funny, and some of it deeply rooted in the dramatic situation, as when Stew deadpans that "no one in this play has ever had to hustle for dimes in South Central." (See? You had to be there.) And while many of the show's attempts at "deep thinking" miss the mark, a few of them are genuinely though-provoking, as when Stew suggests to his younger self that the concrete realities he's looking for may only exist in art.


As for the design elements, there's nothing too flashy, except for the many neon lights at the back of the stage. These are by Kevin Adams, and while they do a serviceable job evoking the various dives that constitute most of the show's settings, they pale in comparison to the work he had done in Spring Awakening and would soon do in Next To Normal. The scenic design is sparse - basically a few chairs - and works well enough. The costume design, on the other hand, is extremely effective, and absolutely crucial in differentiating the roles of the "quartet" of friends as the Youth makes his way from California to Germany. It's the costumes that also establish, from the start of the show, the connection between our narrator Stew and the impetuous Youth.

I was actually invited to review the DVD of Passing Strange, but I see that I've used up almost all of my space discussing the show itself. If I can't be verbose, then let me be clear: this is, hands-down, the best video recording I've seen of a stage show. Some of that, I'm sure, is due to budget: Spike Lee has a dozen or more cameras all over the theater, something clearly beyond the means of PBS or Lincoln Center. But it's clearly also a matter of talent and artistry: from moment to moment, the director has carefully chosen each shot and each angle so that we see precisely what we're supposed to see. He also shows admirable restraint, letting the performances speak for themselves. The few cinematic tricks that he does employ - a sort of fuzziness when drugs are being used, as well as a "home movie" effect when one character is shown filming another - are appropriate and unobtrusive. If I have one qualm, it's that the shots that show the audience detract a little from the viewing experience, but I suppose that's a byproduct of his laudable commitment to filming a live performance of the show.

In short, if you missed Passing Strange on Broadway and have any curiosity at all about the show, do not hesitate to buy or rent this DVD. That is all.

 
Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.206

Thursday, March 24, 2011

LOGOS: Sister Act

I just don't understand this one.  I mean, I've seen the film it is based upon.  I've been following its gestation to Broadway enough to know that the show takes place in the 70's disco era, the one major change from the film.  And I have given it (probably way too) much thought.  I just do not understand where they are going with the logo/promo art for Sister Act.

OK, I'll concede that even as popular as the film was, uh, still is - it is on cable almost every weekend - maybe trying to sell singing and dancing nuns on Broadway has perplexed the ad people.  Maybe test audiences didn't respond to something closer to the film logo or even a logo with nuns kicking up their heels failed the test.  I would argue that maybe they didn't try hard enough.  After all, Nunsense and all dozen of its sequels have run everywhere and were huge in New York for more than a decade.  And those Nuns on the Run or Nuns Having Fun calendars fly off the shelves every Christmas.  But who am I?  A lowly consumer trying to figure out if I want to shell out nearly $150 for what they are trying to sell down at the Broadway Theatre.  That's who.

The Logo on the Official Playbill Cover

Let's look at the primary image of the logo, which also happens to be the titling.  A bright blue background is eye-catching.  Ask the folks at 9 to 5: The Musical, A Life in the Theatre, Come Fly Away, How to Succeed in Business..., and, gulp, Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark.  Looks like blue is several seasons' black on the Great White Way...  Then we have the HUGE words SISTER ACT, which kind of leap out at you with a kind of 3D print effect, but not really.  It is bright red, another eye-catching color, but it is so big and so crammed together at the same time...  and what does the lettering style say to us?  Hmmm...  except the star that dots the "I", I see no real religious reference, or even a show bizzy flare (a nod to the main character's vocation and/or how she makes the boring nuns sing and become stars).  Wait, is the 3D thing supposed to be the show biz flare?  Or is the white highlight that runs through the lettering supposed to make it look like the words are in lights?  No matter what, it looks like someone took a pen to a blank page and was told to write "Sister Act" as fast as they could, and no matter how it turned out, that was the look they'd use.

There are two things I like about it.  One, the "glow" effect behind it does suggest something Heavenly.  I love the subtlety, if that's what that is.  And, two, the tag line, as obvious as it is - a Divine Musical Comedy - at least has something to do with the content of the show.

The Logo in action at the Broadway Theatre

There is a big billboard for the show outside the St. James Theatre, which has the title in giant sequins, which I admit really works much better.  Nothing says show biz (or disco era) like giant glitter (someone should mention that to the Priscilla team).  And there are caricatures of smiling, happy (are they singing?) nuns.  Each one is different and silly.  And a step in the right direction.  My first thought was, "are these drawing of the actual cast?  I'll have to come look after I see the show."  Then I remembered that these cuties have adorned the show's website since before it was cast, so clearly that is not the case.  Maybe these are the London nuns on loan?

Is she or isn't she?  No.  She is not.  At least not yet.

The truth is, if all I had to go on was this logo, I'd think "cheap imitation of beloved film."  And I'd buy a ticket to another show.  And to be even more honest, if I didn't know that it wasn't the case, if I was Joe average, occasional show attendee, I'd think Whoopi Goldberg was actually IN Sister Act.  Why?  Because right above the title, in bright lettering (actual show biz flare!) it says "Whoopi Goldberg."  In my excitement, I'd skip right over the "and Stage Entertainment" and totally miss the minuscule "present."  Now, Sister Act, with the star of the film in the Broadway show!!??  Sign me up.

And the sad thing is if you Googled "Whoopi" and "Sister Act musical," you'll get articles that say she was in it.  Yes, in London, right before it closed.  But I'll bet the keyboard I'm typing on that there are people who have purchased tickets thinking that very thing.

I hope the show is better than the logo.  Maybe with a little divine intervention...

Grade: D-


Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.205