Showing posts with label 2009-2010 season. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2009-2010 season. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

RANT and RAVE: The Replacements

This week, two high profile cast replacements were named for two hit Broadway shows.  One of them was so high profile, it was on the news!  When was the last time THAT happened (Spider-Man, not withstanding)?


The first, though, came the announcement that Adam Pascal would be replacing Tony-nominee Chad Kimball at the end of October in 2010's Best Musical, Memphis.  My first thought was, "really??"  I mean, there is no doubt that Pascal is talented and is a near expert in conveying chemistry.  Look at him and Daphne Ruben-Vega in RENT (or with Anthony Rapp) for that matter.  Or he and his AIDA co-star, Heather Headley - smoking hot and romantic, too!  That look in the final scene...mmmmm.  Yes. Mr. Pascal should have no trouble with the smouldering sexy chemistry with equally sexy and smouldering Montego Glover.


I guess I'm having trouble picturing the quirky, vulnerable, innocent-yet-worldly-wise Huey Calhoun in Adam Pascal.  Of course, he is an actor, a very good one, even if his prior roles have a certain similarity that is not really in this new character.  I guess I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.  Just as I did with Kristin Chenoweth when she departed from her "norm" and tackled (beautifully, in my opinion) a challenging out of the box role.  Instead, maybe I should wish him well and warn him that as much as critics (and some fans) bemoan the fact that actors rarely venture beyond the expected, they rarely embrace the brave ones that do.  Good luck!


The really high profile replacement announcement came today at a press conference live from Sardi's.  Looks like Nick Jonas will be Daniel Radcliffe's permanent replacement in How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying.  It is also now clear that producers are looking to fill the seats at the Hirschfeld with Tweens and their parents.

Let's not forget that the first replacement is actually Glee's Darren Criss, who will also appeal to the tween set, just as Radcliffe did before, and Jonas will after.  But there is a bit of an error in thinking here, and it has nothing whatsoever to do how well all three of them do or will do in the role.  I adored Mr. Radcliffe in the role, and have no doubt that both Mr. Criss and Mr. Jonas will do just fine, finding their own way with the role.

The error in thinking, I think, is that tweens and their parents will embrace these newcomers in the same magnitude, i.e. SRO crowds.  Radcliffe has something neither Criss nor Jonas has: international stardom cultivated by over a decade of growing up before our very eyes in the most successful movie franchise, based on the most popular book series of all time.  He played a character on film that kids and their parents read in those books.  Arguably as many adults kept up with Harry Potter as their kids did.  The appeal of Daniel Radcliffe is multi-generational, backed up by a star turn performance.

A pair of Finches: Darren Criss and Nick Jonas

Criss, with just a three week run, should draw the hordes of Glee-Kurt/Blaine fans, keeping interest and numbers high.  And, to some extent, Glee fans are multi-generational just as Potter fans are.  I bring this up because IF tweens are the target audience, someone has to BRING them to the theatre.  Radcliffe and Criss give parents as much reason to come to the show.  Now, I admit I know the least about the current appeal of Nick Jonas.  How much appeal does he have without his other brothers?  How much will his performance in Les Miserables, which divided fans and critics alike, effect the B.O. for H2$?  Will parents want to sit through the show just to keep their kids happy?  And does Jonas have the same appeal/acceptance by tween boys AND girls as Radcliffe?

Since Mr. Jonas has the most Broadway experience of the three  - he's been on the boards in Annie Get Your Gun, Beauty and the Beast and Les Miserables - I don't think his ability onstage is even a question.  But I do wonder about his ability to draw news-making crowds.

All bets are off if they can find a nostalgic appeal for the parents when the recast John Larroquette.
Do you plan to see Adam, Darren and/or Nick?  Write in and let us know!


Rate this blog below and leave your comments here, by email at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
3.009

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

LOGOS: Hair

Here we are in the midst of the "Summer of Love," with the return of the 60's to Broadway.  Heck, except for The Phantom of the Opera, 44th Street is pretty much one big infomercial's worth of American rock n' roll.  We've got the 50's and early 60's covered with original tunes from Memphis, and classic hits in Baby, It's You!  Across the street has 80's rock screaming from its outdoor speakers at the Helen Hayes Theatre, home of  Rock of Ages (it is an odd sensation to cross the street mid-block when your ears pick up Journey AND the Shirelles).

When American Idiot closed, the new century went unrepresented, but Broadway rock fans, don't despair!  Late 60's psychedelic tunes are back!  Let the sunshine in!  Hair is back!  Last time around, I wasn't blogging, so I thought I'd take this second chance to talk about its colorful logo.


Like most of the best Broadway logos, this show's is a hit in four ways: its title is easy to discern, it is noticeably colorful, it easily changes into "variations on a theme," and its largest logo tells the story of the show without giving too much away.

The vibrant blue color and the radiating sunburst of lines, to me, at least, suggest both the natural "sun" element, astrologically and naturally associated with the hippies, who make up the "American tribe," named in the show's subtitle.  While the combination of the lines and the blended colors in the title resemble tie-dyed clothing, another iconic element of the free love movement.  And you can see that it works just as well in reverse.


In fact, the reverse version, even more resembling the sunburst, really fits with the addition of the song title/rallying cry, "Let the Sunshine In."  Add to it the multi-hued blue hands, free and reaching for the sun as one - as a tribe, as well as the quintessential hippie girl, smiling and carefree reaching the highest.  Love beads, peace necklace and fringe leather vest, her arms are lifted in joy.  Freedom and rebellion were never so close, and the movement portrayed in the show is brought vividly to life in this logo.


The simplicity of the lettering reminds me of both the lettering on so many protest placards, and, somehow, computerized lettering, which ultimately brings the show from the sixties fully into the 21st century.  How fitting, given this particular production's relationship to the times in which we live,

Grade: A

Rate this blog below, and feel free to leave a comment here, by email at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.318

Monday, May 9, 2011

REVIEW: Memphis (Film)

Review of the nationwide screening of Memphis: A New Musical on May 3, 2011.  Starring Chad Kimball, Montego Glover, Derrick Baskin, Cass Morgan, J. Bernard Calloway, James Monroe Iglehart and Michael McGrath and the Broadway Cast.  Music by David Bryan.  Book and lyrics by Joe DiPietro.  Choreography by Sergio Trujillo.  Directed for the Stage by Christopher Ashley.  Directed for Film by Don Roy King.  Running time: 2:45, including pre-show documentary and intermission.

GRADE: A

Opera has been doing it for years (live and recorded) and some West End shows, too.  And now, at last, Broadway has joined the cinema revolution with the recent screenings of Memphis.  This is history in the making, folks, and it is a concept I fully embrace.  This screening, at limited screens and at limited times, brings Broadway to the masses if the masses so choose to partake.  The show couldn't be more current (just a year old AND the current Tony-winning Best Musical) making it a draw for true theatre fans all over the country, and at $20 a ticket (plus a small fee), affordable in comparison to the real thing.  By making it a strictly limited engagement at a limited number of theatres, it not only makes the film a "special event,", but it also takes away the fear that it could seriously impact the audience of the show at the Shubert Theatre.  If anything, at least from what I heard people saying during the intermission, it should help it gain some audience on tour and on Broadway.  Why?  Because as great as film is, and this one in particular is pretty darned great, it will never replace the experience of live theatre.  But a close approximation might just light the fire under a few and reignite the fire for people who haven't been in awhile.

There are many advantages to film.  First, as the show was filmed live over several performances, the best of each scene and number can be edited together to create a "definitive edition."  Second, you get a great view, no matter where you sit, and you get to see things that even a front row seat at the theatre doesn't give you, like tight close-ups, focus on reactions by the supporting and ensemble characters, and even sweeping views of the whole stage when important.  Third, with special recognition for film sound designer Matt Kaplowitz, you can hear the orchestra and singers at comparable and notably clearer levels.  The sound literally surrounds you and every lyric, word and note is crystal clear.  And, of course, it drowns out the chatty Cathys that inevitably sit right behind you, running commentary and all.

Of course, there are some disadvantages to film versus live performance; as I said, film will never replace the live theatre experience.  First, film also "tells" you what to look at - you have no choice as to what you are seeing as the film is the only view you get at any given minute.  Second, there is automatically a limit to how much you can react to something. There are no holds for laughs, and, while the audience I attended with applauded freely throughout, there is no chance for really being enthusiastic without clapping yourself into not being able to hear the next scene.  And finally, and perhaps most importantly, you have no live connection going on between cast and audience.  That electric current between the house and the stage is notably absent.  Yes, you can hear the recorded audience react, but it just isn't the same.

There is one aspect of the film that I loved, simply because you can't really do it in a live performance, and there is one thing that inadvertently effects a filmed version of a live show.  What I really loved was in act two, during Huey's TV show, we often saw it as if we were watching our old black and white TVs.  We could see it the way it was meant to be seen, in effect.  The thing that I really didn't like is that with the sound so attuned to the performers, no slack could be cut for breathing loudly and for all those little sounds we make between words and sentences.  Live, it comes off naturally.  HD sound makes it sound odd. 

Fortunately (or unfortunately, as you choose to look at it) this really only effected Chad Kimball, a heavy breather and word-slurrer/gasper/grunter of the highest order.  Because Mr. Kimball is portraying a larger than life character, some license has been given in allowing him to exaggerate speech and physicality, I am sure.  And as he was really performing for a full house in a theatre that is gigantic compared to the multiplex, his performance is notably large.  On film, he comes across sometimes as over acting, and not just eccentric and a little slow, but perhaps mentally challenged as well.  Still, with the balance of everyone around him and some truly beautiful vocal work on his part during the musical numbers, his excesses are easily overlooked.



The rest of the cast comes off exceedingly well.  Montego Glover has starlet written all over her - the camera LOVES her.  Cass Morgan's work on the details of her character are much more evident close up, and the broadness of Derrick Baskin, J. Bernard Calloway, James Monroe Iglehart and Michael McGrath are even more delicious on the big screen.  And the ensemble is vastly talented as they dance and sing in a wide variety of styles as the score calls for.

The film, directed by Don Roy King manages to capture most of the theatricality of Christopher Ashley's stage direction, and leaves me wondering all over again how Sergio Trujillo's spectacular choreography wasn't even nominated for a Tony Award last year.  Memphis is one dancin' extravaganza as this film captures so beautifully.

Soon, this will be available on DVD, and I will buy it.  And I will be attending the filmed version of the New York Philharmonic concert of Stephen Sondheim's Company.  I encourage all of you to do the same.  Supporting this kind of union of two art forms is a win for everyone.

(Photos of the Broadway production by Joan Marcus)


Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.252

Friday, April 22, 2011

REVIEW: American Idiot (Final Company)

Review of the April 20 evening performance. At the St. James Theatre on Broadway, New York City. 95 minutes, with no intermission. Starring Van Hughes, Justin Guarini, David Larsen, Rebecca Naomi Jones, Libby Winters, Jeanna De Waal, Joshua Henry and Billie Joe Armstrong . Choreographed by Steven Hoggett. Directed by Michael Mayer.  Closes April 24.

Grade: A

I often return to shows I really enjoyed the first time, and I enjoyed American Idiot both times I saw it.  But if you had said to me that I'd be returning a 3rd time, specifically to see the closing cast of the show, I'd have said you were crazy.  At the time, I'd have been surprised that I saw it twice!  But that second time, I enjoyed it more than the first, and to be honest, I rarely go a week without listening to the cast recording to this day.  Part of it has to do with what I like to call the next to normal effect, another show I saw in previews, after it opened, with the replacement cast, and at its actual closing.  The other part has to do with my frequent theatre companion, Mike, who loves this show like I do next to normal.  He got me to the final show of that, and I got him to as close to the last as I could with this.  And, man, am I glad I did!  Because WOW!  What a show!

It so happens that Wednesday was the show's first anniversary and it was being filmed.  Bittersweet with the imminent closing, the audience was pumped to celebrate, and the full cast was there ready to record their work into the video history of Broadway.  The excitement was palpable, and given the age range of the crowd and multitudes of Green Day fans, it was electric, but respectfully subdued, as if we were all on the same page: celebrate, appreciate, and let the best possible show get into the history books.

Future generations of theatre students may be surprised to watch the video of this performance and wonder why it closed so prematurely.  I could offer a bunch of reasons, but none have to do with the quality of the show or its company.

Here is the one negative thing I have to say about American Idiot: there are still parts of it that I think are overwrought and on the verge of unnecessary.  That said, there are even fewer of them now than when I first saw it.

And now, what I loved:

The replacement cast of principals,
with Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes
  • The replacement cast, almost to a person, I prefer to the original company, which is a tall order, and something I'm surprised to say even as I type this.  I loved and respected the work of John Gallagher Jr, Stark Sands, Michael Esper, Christina Sajous, Mary Faber and Tony Vincent.  They abounded in raw energy and a desperation worn on their sleeves and gave completely valid, superb performances.  But only Jeanna de Waal, as Heather, isn't as good as her original counterpart.  And Ms. de Waal does a fine job even though I say that.
  • Original cast member Rebecca Naomi Jones, superb from the first time I saw the show, has really melded with this company, and really brought up her already excellent work.  She brings even more depth and much needed nuance to Whatsername.  And that works especially well, since every other leading performance is much deeper, more grounded without being dull, and exquisitely layered.

Billie Joe Armstrong
  • Many in the audience came to see Billie Joe Armstrong, lead singer of Green Day and co-author of the show.  He is, quite simply, the better of the two St. Jimmy's I saw.  First of all, he sings the role superbly, finding, as the author should, added meaning to certain phrases, adding pauses for emphasis and really attacking the vocals.  But he is also a fine actor - not a refined actor - who knows how to give and take in a scene, and watching him go move for move with Johnny and holding the ensemble in St. Jimmy's drug haze of submission is both super cool to watch and, in retrospect, very chilling and disturbing.  Here's hoping Mr. Armstrong comes back to Broadway and soon.

Libby Winters as Extraordinary Girl
(Shown here with Stark Sands as Tunny)
  • Libby Winters as Extraordinary Girl is terrific, too, in every way.  She is wordlessly strong, compassionate and loving.  There was an almost indefinable intensity to her performance, and the girl can sing!  And there was something kind of all-American warped about her flying sequence with Tunny.  As her burka fell to the floor and exposed her long blonde locks, I was instantly reminded of "I Dream of Jeannie" but also of a Barbie Doll.  And what is more American (and more disturbing) than watching Barbie and G.I. Joe swirl around in a morphine-induced haze?

David Larsen
  • Which brings me to the amazing David Larsen on loan from Billy Elliot.   I am shocked to say that I preferred his performance to that of Mr. Sands, because it was Sands' performance that I truly adored about the original cast.  But Mr. Larsen is somehow the more complete package.  He is intense as an outcast, intense as an Army man, and yet he is flawed, depressed and ultimately strong as he rises to the next challenges his life will bring as a disabled veteran.  His transformation is mesmerizing, emotionally challenging, and absolutely riveting.  And what a singer!  He took a brilliantly played role to the next level.  I look forward to his (next) inevitable star turn.

Jeanne de Waal and Justin Guarini
  • Justin Guarini continues to surprise the hell out of me.  After an absolutely terrific debut in Women on the Verge, he comes out of the Idiot gate at full, explosive gallop.  He is showing an impressive range of talents here, and like Mr. Larsen, I look forward to seeing his growth into a true Broadway star.  Mr. Guarini's performance as couch potato/slacker Will is incredible.  I don't think there is any more anyone could do with the role without destroying its intent.  He performs with such passion and depth, that at last Will is an equal among these three friends, who undergoes as life-changing a journey as as both Johnny and Tunny do, albeit a less obvious one.  Guarini's lack of experience shows only a little as he relies frequently on the same wide-eyed glare expression to show us he REALLY means what he's saying, and one wishes he'd tug on his shirt to expose his abs (nice as they are) every time he gets confused and tries to hide it.  But other than that, WOW!

Van Hughes
  • And finally, there is the exquisitely down to earth, Tony-worthy performance of Van Hughes as Johnny, the self-proclaimed "Jesus of Suburbia."  By taking a decidedly more grounded approach to the role, Johnny, flaws and all, becomes that much more accessible to those of us of another generation, be it older like me or future potential Johnnys.  In him we can see the discontentment with life and the desire to run from it all.  He is the lack of American Dream personified, furious at a world that promises him the great, uninhibited life and never delivers - something all of us can relate to or will be able to in a few short years.  That he sings the role well is to be expected, I guess, but the amazing layers he puts on to this performance makes it almost impossible to take your eyes off of him.  He also does amazing "scene work" as it were with his two buddies, and especially with Ms. Jones, with whom the sexual sparks fly, but also the turmoil of love, love lost and the harsh reality of an important relationship broken, all come together with the same impact as, say, Tony and Maria in West Side Story.  Hughes also transforms from rebellious twenty-something to a grounded fully aware adult, sad as that is.  He exudes sexuality, disillusion and righteous indignation that combine to make the character all the richer, and therefore, the entire show that much more meaningful.


TOP: Andrew Call
BOTTOM: Joshua Henry
  • I would be remiss not to mention the absolutely superb ensemble, who to a person, have really settled down and allow the direction and choreography to have its fullest impact.  In the past, I have been particularly hard on Gerard Canonico, who at last is no longer mugging his way through the show, but contributing without pulling focus.  Miguel Cervantes, Andrew Call and Chase Peacock all continue to do excellent work in small roles and as a part of the whole.  Joshua Henry is still the ultimate "Favorite Son"!  And I have to single out Alysha Umphress who makes the most out of every single second she is on stage.  I find my eye drawn to her and 100% of the time find her to be interesting and on target.

Ultimately, nothing lasts forever on Broadway.  It is the nature of the beast.  Still, it saddens me that a show that is in better shape now than when it opened is closing so soon.  It has been a banner year because they were a part of it.  The title of their curtain call number, "Good Riddance," is inappropriate here.  But last Wednesday, I did have the time of my life.  Bring on the National Tour!

(And thanks, Mike, for letting me find my way on my own with this one.  You were right all along.)

(Photos from Broadway.com, Bruce Glikas photographer)

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.234

Monday, February 14, 2011

CD REVIEW: La Cage aux Folles (2010 Revival Cast)

With the major shift in the cast due to begin tomorrow, I thought I'd take a look today at what was preserved of the original cast of the 201 Tony Award-winning Best Revival of a Musical.  I know I am in the minority about this revival of La Cage aux Folles.  The "de-glamorizing" of it doesn't really work for me, and neither does half of the Tony-winning performance of Douglas Hodge.  No one should have to work that hard to put across the I'm marching to my own beat/I march to my own beat to hide my insecurities thing.  While the show - sentimental and as trite as it is today - remains among my favorites of all time, this production leaves me lukewarm at best, turned off at least.  And unfortunately, this cast recording has done nothing to change my feelings about it.


Title: La Cage aux Folles

Artist: New Broadway Cast
Label: PS Classics
Number: PS-1094
Format: Single CD
Case: Standard Jewel Case
Booklet: Full color booklet, with an essay, complete lyrics, credits and dozens of full color production photos.



What I said about the show and its stars: "So what about the play? The play and music both hold up exceptionally well, particularly Herman's saccharine-sweet, but lovable score. But, with a lot of the shock value gone now, Fierstein's book, while hilarious (we still love to laugh at the gays) as ever, is a bit quaint, and even a bit cliche. OK, not cliche, because the original (and the play and movie it was based on) started the whole thing. But subsequent productions, the film The Birdcage, and even The Addams Family now, have made this plot pretty obvious. But you expect that to an extent at a revival, anyway. And no one really tinkered with the proven, which is good.  How does it work "scaled-down" and "edgy"? It does and it doesn't. I really didn't see "edgy" on my visit. I saw plenty of overacting and needless and intrusive characterization where there should have been none. But the "scaled-down" worked 80% very well. And all of that can easily be laid to blame and praise in the hands of director Terry Johnson. The stage never felt crowded or claustrophobic, and it was a very good choice - economically and thematically - to have the same actors portray common citizens of St. Tropez and the ultra-conservative politician and wife determined to get rid of anything that doesn't reek of moral fortitude and family values.  [Still] there is no way this La Cage would be "the jewel of the Riviera." Cubic zirconia, maybe... the script does not bear out the dingy, run-down quality of the setting."


 

"The other chief problem I have with this production is co-star Douglas Hodge as Albin/Zsa Zsa.  I don't care how many awards he has already won, or the ones he could very well get in the future.  His performance in Act One is so over the top - he mugs and prances in a way that Broadway might not have seen since the Benny Hill years.  [But then] the Douglas Hodge of Act One is gone, and the award-winning Douglas Hodge is in his place.  He has brought the whole Zsa Zsa -as-defense-mechanism thing down about 50 notches, lets his own quirky accent and inflection take over, and he shows amazing depth as an actor.  The minute he makes his first entrance in act two, you see a man in pain, devastated by his own child, and still fiercely protective of his whole family.  In short, he is family values personified."


"OK, so what about the other star of the show, Kelsey Grammer?  Let me just list the adjectives: revelatory, distinctive, charming, charismatic, brilliant.  He is funny, sharp, and an incredibly good crooner (he's no Sinatra, but his voice is magnificent).  But most importantly, throughout BOTH acts of the show, he is giving a grounded in reality, down to earth performance that is notable for many things, but most appreciably for its understated grace.  His Georges is completely believable as night club owner, lover to an eccentric and bitter queen, a loving, doting father, and as a pillar of the community.  Were the role flashier, I'd call him a shoo-in for a Tony nod (and I am still hoping he gets one, though history says it will go to Hodge, like the other Zsa Zsas before him).  When he sings "Song on the Sand," you fall in love with him, and when he sings "Look Over There," you are reduced to tears, all schmaltz acted right through.  I am so glad I got to see him in this role."


On the Recording and the Stand Out Songs:  As I said at the top, this recording does not change my mind about the production is preserves.  In fact, I think I would like the production even less had I heard the recording first, or maybe I'd have skipped the revival altogether.  That said, I am still glad I saw it for all of the reasons - well, the reason - I praised it: Kelsey Grammer - who is as good, if not better on the recording.

And there are other things to praise about this recording:
  • It is a more complete documentation of the score.
  • There is a good deal of dialogue included, and all of it is well played and helps the CD.
  • The orchestra is MUCH better recorded than live.
  • The booklet is also first rate - having the lyrics alone is worth opening the jewel case!  And the pictures capture a La Cage that you you don't see onstage.  As focused and cropped as they are, you'd think this show was a cavalcade of glitz and glamor, rather than a cheapened, pared-down version.

But what was wrong onstage is still as wrong, if not more so on the recording: Douglas Hodge in any of the first 12 tracks.  The difference is that the vocals alone make his nutty, over-the-top performance seem even more schizo that it is.  Talk about over acting!  And it ruins probably my favorite song in the whole show, "A Little More Mascara."

And so the songs that really stand out for me are "Song on the Sand," "La Cage aux Folles" (especially all the terrific lyrics additions and the fact that you can understand every word clear as a bell) and "Look Over There," which makes me tear up just listening to it.

Ultimately, I'll keep playing the Original Cast Recording, and burn a few selected tracks of this one onto my computer.  That way I can get a Kelsey fix whenever I need it.

Grade: C
 


 

 


Comments?  Leave one here, email me or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.167

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

THEATRE BOOK REVIEW: The Playbill Broadway Yearbook, Vol. 6

Theatre Book Review: The Playbill Broadway Yearbook: June 2009 - May 2010, Sixth Annual Edition.  Edited by Robert Viagas.  Published by Applause Theatre and Cinema Books/Playbill, an Imprint of Hal Leonard. Copyright 2010. Hardcover. 478 pages. (NOTE: Please see full disclosure notice at the bottom of this review.) 

 
Grade: A+

 
Just like when I was in high school, I can't wait each year for the annual Playbill Broadway Yearbook.  And this edition (June 2009 - May 2010, Volume 6) is no exception; as usual, it was worth the wait!

If you aren't familiar with this series of books, you really owe it to your theatre-loving self to get these books.  (Playbill Online's Store has back issues at a ridiculously low price for each, and even this current one is on sale there.)  They are an easy to read memento of every show that played on Broadway during the 2009 - 2010 season. Literally.

Each show starts off with its own page featuring a Playbill cover, the cast list as of opening night for new shows or as of a certain week in October for long-runners (they had to pick a cut-off, right?).  There are full production notes and credits, including crews, producers, and lists of musical numbers (for the musicals, naturally).  There are full color production shots and, perhaps best of all, headshots of every single actor in every single show, plus the creative team, too!  My favorite parts of that are the "Alumni" and "Transfer Students" sections, which give us headshots of each actor who departed the show in the past season and those of actors who joined, but aren't on the "official yearbook cast list."  And talk about inclusive!  Most shows even have pictures of the house usher staff, the box office staff, and everyone backstage from wigs to sound who make our favorite shows run smoothly!

Most shows also have a "Scrapbook" page, contributed by cast members or crew members or both. On those pages there are fun candid shots and cool little stories and lists of things like "Sayings only the company would understand", "The person with the most roles", "the fastest costume changes, " and "most cell phone rings during a performance."

Three such scrapbooks that stood out for me in this edition were:
  • Valerie Harper discussing the final show of Looped, and how grateful the whole company was to be remembered at Tony time.
  • The heartfelt - it made me teary - full page, event by event description of 9 to 5: The Musical's final performance by cast member Tory Ross.
  • The sweet account by former Sophie in Mamma Mia! Alysa Alan Louis of an 8 year old fan, and the actresses realization of the impact Broadway can have on children.
  • The obvious pride of the Memphis team.

There is also a comprehensive section of articles and many color photos of every theatre related awards show and charity event, from the Tonys to the Theatre World Awards to Broadway Bares, Broadway Bears,and Broadway Barks.  My favorite photo in that section has to be the candid of Angela Lansbury and Len Cariou at an event together.  Mrs. Lovett and Sweeney Todd have aged gracefully, for sure!

Two of the best parts are the very beginning and the very end.  The book starts with a comprehensive overview compiled by the Yearbook Staff: A date by date Timeline of Events and an article called "Head of the Class," including such things as "Awards They Should Give" and "Tribute Shows That End with a Big Picture of the Subject Hanging Over the Stage."  (There were 3: Million Dollar Quartet, Come Fly Away and Sondheim on Sondheim.)  The book ends with an easy to read (the print is HUGE) and unbelievably complete Index.

This series is one that I go back to time and time again.  They don't just sit on my shelf.  I love to go back over the years of a show and see how the pictures and thoughts change from season to season.  This is one nice, collectible, if-you-only-buy-one-Broadway-book-a -year book.

(Notice of Full Disclosure:  This year, I was contacted by Applause Books and offered a complimentary press copy of the book to review.  I did accept the complimentary copy, with the understanding that I would give an honest opinion of the contents, which you read above.  I at no time felt obligated to present only positive comments.  You may note that I reviewed last season's edition with similar positivity, and I bought that copy myself.)

 

Comments?  Leave one here, email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com, or Tweet me.
Jeff 
2.126

Saturday, November 13, 2010

The 2010 Out 100

From one year-end list yesterday to another today...  Out magazine has released its list of the 100 most culturally influential LGBT people of 2010.  There are a lot of theatre people on the list.  What is nice is that they aren't all actors; the list is inclusive of most of the creative process.

The "theme" of the list this year is major events in gay history/culture, and as such the photographs reflect 3 different styles: Studio 54, The Stonewall Riot, and Truman Capote's Black and White Ball.  The magazine enlisted 3 photographers to capture the mood and the people: Jason Schmidt, Roger Erickson and Larry Fink, respectively.

I have arranged the theatre people in alphabetical order.  To see the entire list, and to read about Out's Entertainer of the Year, Ricky Martin, click HERE.  Enjoy!

After his awesome "Le Jazz Hot" from Victor/Victoria,
not to mention some damned fine acting on Glee, I had to make
Chris Colfer an honorary "theatre guy."

In the center, seated is Tony-winner Alan Cumming,
and standing, center, is Tony-nominee Cheyenne Jackson.

Directors Scott Elliott and Michael Mayer add class to any party.
Elliott's New Group continues to grow from its Avenue Q beginnings
to this year's The Kid a musical about gay adoption.  Mayer, of course,
Made a huge splash on Broadway this year, shepherding American Idiot
from Berkeley Rep to the St. James Theatre.

Love! Valour! Compassion! and Cabaret alum
(among many other projects) John Benjamin Hickey
has branched his career out into TV and film,
but theatre is never too far from the front burner.

Diminutive Leslie Jordan (left) was a hit off-Broadway
this season with his show My Trip Down the
Pink Carpet, which will be seen shortly in London. 

A Life in the Theatre star TR Knight returned to Broadway
this year, and also made quite an impression in the LA company
of Parade.  Looks like he's put Grey's Anatomy behind him.

Million Dollar Quartet and a Tony for Best
Featured Actor in a Musical put Levi Kreis
on the Broadway map this year.  Let's hope he stays.

Broadway star (and there are so few of them anymore)
Nathan Lane makes the list with his hilarious turn
as Gomez in The Addams Family.

Broadway's original Sky in Mamma Mia!,
Joe Machota (standing, far right) has left acting
and is one of Broadway's biggest agents.

Out's Entertainer of the Year, Ricky Martin,
is no stranger to Broadway, having done a
stint in the original run of Les Miserables, and
his upcoming turn as Che in the revival of Evita.

Three for one!  next to normal's star, director,
and writer all made the list this year!  Kyle Dean
Massey, Michael Greif and Brian Yorkey represent
their show and New York theatre very well.

John Cameron Mitchell, now making a name for himself
as a film director, is never far from the stage, either.  Most famous for
Hedwig and the Angry Inch (still rumored to be Broadway-bound),
he is prepping the film version of Rabbit Hole for release.

Actress Julianne Moore, Out's Artist of the Year,
makes the "theatre" cut this year (though she starred
in The Vertical Hour a few seasons ago) because she
penned the children's book Freckleface Strawberry,
upon which the popular new musical is based.

Geoffrey Nauffts gained a lot of attention this year when his play Next Fall
made the trip uptown to Broadway.  He is also a writer for the
Broadway-friendly TV show Brothers and Sisters.


With 18 on the list, I guess there is no denying that theatre people still make significant cultural contributions to this country.  Congratulations to all!

(All photos are from Out Magazine, who owns the copyright to all of them.)

Comments?  Leave one here, email me, or Tweet me!
Jeff
2.74

Friday, September 17, 2010

All Good Things...

Geez, you take to your sick bed for a couple of days and all hell breaks loose!  (Thank you to those thoughtful emailers who were actually worried when I missed 2 days!  You are sweet to worry; I appreciate it!)

OK, first comes the news that my favorite revival, West Side Story will NOT feature a retuen of Tony winner Karen Olivo!  Then, to add insult to injury... the show will close!  (I'm not surprised, just disappointed.)

THEN, my other favorite revival, Promises, Promises will be closing, too!  ON THE SAME DAY!  And I am thankful that all of the major players saw fit to extend 1 week to finish out the show.

And if unconfirmed (but highly likely) rumors are true, I will be inconsolable if a certain favorite - absolute favorite - of mine also closes on that date.  I simply cannot name it until it becomes true...

Still... much to be thankful for on all three accounts. 

We will never see a West Side Story again directed by the man who wrote it.  And it will have run longer than the original Broadway production - 732 original, 748 revival.

This Promises, Promises won't even come close to its original run, but what are the chances that this perios piece will be done again anytime soon?  Plus, it inroduced Sean Hayes to Broadway, in what I hope will NOT be his only role.  And perhaps, in the long run, more importantly, we saw one of musical theatres greatest stars, Kristin Chenoweth take a risk in a role that most people couldn't bend their frame of reference enough to see her fit.  In my opinion, she was smashing and brave.

And should the lost one that shall not be named close on that date (or one later in the month as further speculation has it)... who would have thought that a show that serious and off the beaten path would have lasted as long as it did?  And improve with age to boot!  Regardless of your personal feelings about it, the show will eventually hold its place on a very short list of those who changed musical theatre boundaries forever.

Whether 2 or 3 shows (or more) end up closing on that day the joy of the New Year will be short lived for this theatre fan.  Still, it is a reminder that the very thing I love so much about live theater - that it is live, done and gone forever - is also thing that I hate the most.  Gone.  Forever.

But then again, if shows didn't close, there wouldn't be room for the West Side Storys or the Promises, Promises... talk about your "circle of life"!  Any word on when THAT might close!?  :-)

And I am really looking forward to the fun that I am sure will be Priscilla: Queen of the Desert!



Comments? Leave one here, Yahoo me, or Tweet me...
Jeff
2.17

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Another One Bites the Dust

I can't say I am surprised, but I can say I am disappointed.  Come Fly Away, the Tharp-Sinatra dance musical, will play its last performance September 5 at the Marquis Theatre.  That leaves you with just 52 chances to see this show (as of today).

Only the second non-scheduled closing of a show (Next Fall being the other), post-Tonys, for weeks the show has been among the lowest in percent of attendance.  The week of July 19 - 25, it was at 49%, with only Race pulling in lower numbers.  Interestingly, it is still managing to gross more than 1/2 a million dollars each week ($547,485 last week), and it still has an average paid admission of $91.03.  Does that mean that a large number of patrons are still paying full price?  That average seems kinda high, all things considered.  Still the numbers are what they are, and they are not enough to warrant use of the cavernous Marquis.



The show got only two Tony nominations, both well-deserved: Twyla Tharp for Outstanding Choreography and Karine Plantadit (above, center) for Best Featured Actress in a Musical.  It won neither.

Personally, I loved the show and still recommend trying to get to see it.  This caliber of dancing is becoming rarer on Broadway, really.  You can read my complete review here.  I'll admit that a wordless musical, where the connection between the song and the action is not always clear, and where the story line is really there, but only if you look for it, can be a lot to ask of an audience.  I love that challenge.  And I always have to laugh when someone laments that shows don't ask much of their audiences anymore.  Because here is a show that asks a lot, and still no one came.


I suspect that the national tour, set to begin in May 2011 in Chicago, should do OK on the road, as middle (and aging) America loves its Sinatra, and the show even looks a tad like the the Lawrence Welk Show (though act two should get the blue-haired old ladies a-chattering).

And so this leaves us with our next question:  Which show will be the next to go?  I'm going to go with Million Dollar Quartet, which has no reason to be running as long as it has already.  (Race and Lend Me a Tenor are already scheduled to end, at the end of contracts, August 23 and 15, respectively.)

And I'm betting a big splashy musical - Priscilla: Queen of the Desert - will snap up the Marquis in a hurry!


Comments? Leave one here or email me at jkstheatrescene. Or send me a question at http://www.formspring.me/ and look me up as "jkstheatrescene" or "Jeff Kyler." Go ahead! Follow me!

Jeff

Monday, July 12, 2010

CD Review: A Little Night Music

With the re-opening of A Little Night Music featuring Bernadette Peters and Elaine Stritch, I thought it most apropos that we take on last look back at the controversial revival's original cast and their performance on the New Broadway Cast Recording.  Sondheim fans, like myself, must of course have this in their collection, and it is important, not only for capturing the Broadway debut of  Tony winner Catherine Zeta-Jones and the possibly final Broadway role of the legendary Angela Lansbury, but also because, at two discs in length, it offers a more complete record of the score and much of Hugh Wheeler's witty, smart and sharp dialogue.


Title: A Little Night Music

Artist: The New Broadway Cast Recording
Label: Nonesuch Records/PS Classics
Number: 523488-2
Format: Double CD
Case: Single Jewel Case, with a 2-sided insert.  CDs and booklet packaged in full-color box
Booklet: Black and white production photos; complete lyrics and included dialogue

Of the Show, I Wrote:  "The Tony-winning musical A Little Night Music is being given a sublime, beautifully rendered and amazingly clear revival at the Walter Kerr Theatre. Boasting the lead talents of no less the five time Tony winner Angela Lansbury, Oscar winner Catherine Zeta-Jones and London transplant, Alexander Hanson, not to mention a supporting cast of many of today's up and coming main stem talents and a multiple award-winning director, Trevor Nunn, this revival is nearly perfect in every way.  Given the austerity of the production - minimal scenery, minimal props, and a scaled back orchestra and the deliberate focusing of the play with a Chekhovian slant, it really calls to notice that much of the first act is a careful, deliberate, and, unfortunately, slow series of expository scenes. That is, plainly, an awful lot of set up, character introduction and plot points."


"It might be the Chekhovian-minimalist approach Trevor Nunn has taken with the piece. That the characters are broad types has never really been in question, but this approach crystallizes those types and brings them to the forefront. Brilliantly, however, this only serves as a bright counterpoint to the darker undertones, nuances and complications of these characters. In short, Nunn has heightened the simplicity to reveal in astonishing clarity the complexity of both the characters and their stories. This may just be the first Broadway musical in High Definition."




Of the Performances, I Wrote:  "From the late in the first act mini-play, also known as Angela Lansbury's definitive rendition of "Liaisons," through and including the classy curtain call, this A Little Night Music is everything a musical should be.  When she takes the stage, you are riveted, hanging on her every word, and more importantly, on her every glance. While her one solo number doesn't afford her the opportunity to do any sort of belting, she wrings every possible drop of emotion out of the song, easily vacillating between the troubling here and now and the glories and disappointments of her past. One look, one drop of her heavily lashed eyelids, conveys as much, if not more of Madame Armfeldt's story. In one song, she is teaching a master class in acting, musical theatre and grace."

"Alexander Hanson is the lone transfer from the London production, and it is immediately apparent the moment he takes the stage. He gives a commanding, fully realized performance. Each of his numbers are beautifully sung and wonderfully acted. He, like his co-stars, takes every opportunity given to him and runs with it.  I expected that Catherine Zeta-Jones would be good, though I wondered how an actress long from the stage would be able to sustain a character and sing and dance for a solid three hours, rather than the little snippets of moments captured on camera over however many takes and cuts. Having seen this remarkable performance, I feel almost ashamed of myself for thinking so. She is a tour de force as an actress, a stunningly beautiful woman, and she makes Desiree a dazzling, never dull, always complex, always thrilling person to watch. And I will go out on a limb here to say that she may just be giving the definitive performance of 'Send in the Clowns.'"


"Finally, I must mention the ensemble of actor/singers, who provide gorgeous vocals for the overture, not a little scenery changing, and wry, well-acted commentary to each and every scene. They are Stephen R. Buntrock, Marissa McGowan, Jayne Paterson and Kevin David Thomas. They provide the glue and flow of this production, never slowing it down."

Of This Recording, I Say:  Minus the lengthy books scenes in Act One, this CD moves at a brisk pace - it is almost a surprise when the first disc is over.  As one might expect, the entire cast is giving all out performances on the recording, pros that they are.  The three leads are exemplary, particularly Mr. Hanson and Ms. Zeta-Jones, both of who act their songs as well as they sing them, adding much needed depth and nuance to the lyrics.  It is Ms. Lansbury, though, who benefits the most.  After all, she has the least to sing (her superlative "Liaisons" remains as superb on recording a it did in performance), but here is given the opportunity to recreate her razor-sharp, glib and blustery performance as much of her dialogue is included to help mold the recording for listeners not as familiar with the piece.  It should be noted, too, that her young scene partners Katherine Leigh Doherty and Keaton Whittaker as Fredrika offers just as lovely a performance with this legend.

As on stage, the ensemble offers some truly lovely, sometimes stunning performances here, particularly in the "Overture/Night Waltz" and "The Sun Won't Set/Night Waltz II" which open each act and here, each disc.  Similarly, the spectacularly cast supporting players are terrific here.  And I have to say, minus the visual of her fussy, sometimes too much so, performance, Ramona Mallory makes an even better Anne.  Aaron Lazar and Erin Davie, with much of their scene work included here and in isolation, also do very well by their roles.  And Leigh Ann Larkin's "The Miller's Son" is as robust and fulfilling.  Finally, Hunter Ryan Herdlicka offers a fine, if wonderfully torment performance as Henrik.


The packaging of this recording is lovely and befitting such a recording.  The booklet, at some 96 pages is a complete print recording, and offers several black and whit production photos which capture the essence of the physical production.

Finally, I must address the other aspect of controversy that seems to hound this production: the paring down of the orchestra.  Naturally, there are benefits and problems with this.  But when you consider that the composer himself went on record to say that this is closer to his original vision than the first production, how can one really quibble?  Jason Carr's orchestrations make the 12 piece group used here sound full and lush without being overbearing.  When coupled with the vocal arrangements of the ensemble, the more lush interludes come out just fine.  And the lack of too much instrumentation really serves to bring forward the wit and wisdom of the lyrics as they never have been before, much like the recent revivals of Sweeney Todd and Company.  Still, there are times when a little more music would have been nice.  And while ultimately, I prefer the performances of this version, I can see the need for having both renderings in one's collection.

What remains to be seen, of course, is how the show will change under the leadership of its new leading ladies, both equally talented and as legendary as their predecessors.  One has to admit Bernadette Peters and Elaine Stritch are completely different.  I'm betting they will be terrific.  But how they effect the delicate balance of this underrated revival remains to be seen.  Let the vultures descend tomorrow.

Grade: A+


Comments: Leave on here or email me at jkstheatrescene@yahoo.com.
Jeff